Generally, I think you did a good job on this area, BUT, I noticed some
typos, problems with grammar, and phrases that simply sounded odd despite
being technically correct.

I wrote down some of the big problems that I noticed on my initial sweep.  It
is not a complete list, since I stopped writing stuff down partway through so
I could just look around.

If you have any questions(I realize some of my notes are a little cryptic),
feel free to ask.

Feldegast

outside.c:
First sentence:
  You stand in the middle of the road in front of a big building.
  SEEM oblivious?  From what perspective is this description written?
  all intended to -> intent upon
scala.c:
A wide set of stone steps leads in.
grow ON either
Why is it down to go in?
A high ceiling
AND libraries
guardian.c:
...for several years
...the stairs.
No one
Despite his old age
like he is in
booth.c:
...get first aid info.
Do not put _ in the short descrip.
airflight views -> overhead views
booth2.c:
_ in short descrip again

Manufacturing AND fluid dynamics
staff consists of four professors
receptionist.c:
$1 is about 20% of minimum wage in the states.  Are you sure that's right?
What is an in-campus employed?
booth3.c:
Forgot a period
Here is a rough map...
receptionist2.c:
straight black
clearly indicates
wont -> won't
corridor1.c:
barter with each other
allows -> allow
guard.c:
rude and menacing
forgot period
student.c:
studying his subjects hard
student31.c:
How could we two look exactly the same?
student3.c:
Her backpack is large and looks heavy because of all the books she is
carrying in it.  She is probably worried about her Physics lessons...
...long studying.
period at end
sala_proiezioni.c:
permits one to see
tecnico.c:
skillful -> skilled
an aggressive
No obvious exit?  How do I get out?
corridor3.c:
have -> has
cross point -> junction? juncture?
Not sure what you mean by second sentence.
dimec2.c of how
dimec4.c:
  are computers
dimec7.c:
sophisticated
volunteer.c:
man's face
to support his family
tecnico2.c:
shoots
dimec6.c:
researchs?  researchers or research?
